Abe E.S. Corpus

I am waiting to see the stages. We may have some rifle targets after all. We will likely shoot five stages.

I asked this question in December but I must not have phrased it clearly. I am not advocating for the right to load eight rounds but if it is the intent of the Committee that an eighth round cannot be used without penalty a revision or clarification is needed.

It is my understanding that as a result of the elimination of the rule that set a maximum number of rounds in a magazine that a shooter may load eight and use eight, even though pistol strings are patterned on multiples of seven. Assume the stage instructions call for a 14 round double tap sweep. Under the 2018 rule, the shooter was limited to 7 rounds in a magazine. Choices were to shoot seven, reload from slide lock and shoot seven, interrupting the double tap between rounds 7 and 8, or shoot six, perform a tactical reload and shoot eight. I think the 2019 rules provide a third option: load first magazine with eight rounds, shoot to slide lock, reload and shoot six. Do I want to keep track of magazines loaded with different numbers of rounds? Maybe not, but I think this would be legal under the 2019 SHB.

The Model 12 that I bought was a later model with the wide forend but I was able to find a used “corncob” forend and replace it.

Plans are in the works to hold a Wild Bunch match as an “option” at the Greenville Gunfighters’ monthly match on October 27, 2019. Early indications are that we will write stages around pistol and shotgun only (I’d like to see an all shotgun stage). More details to follow.

We had 17 shooters at the match. The “no rifle” format allowed us to focus on shotgun and pistol. The regular WB shooters experienced very few pistol malfunctions. Thanks to Cotton Gloves and the folks at High Country Cowboys for putting the match together.

Cotton Gloves posted on Facebook that the High Country Cowboys in Wolf Laurel, NC are hosting a six stage “no rifle” Wild Bunch match in August 31. 168 pistol targets! Looks like two stages with six shotgun. I’ve marked my calendar!

Good discussion. These situations are likely to arise with the pistol especially now that the rule limiting the number of rounds that can be loaded in a magazine has been eliminated.

Thank you, Jack. I posted my question here knowing that social media discussions are not official. I do appreciate your statement about the downsides of clearing on the line. I had not considered that to be a departure from a safety convention and so not allowed at a sanctioned match. We cleared on the line on my posse at a recent match held at a club with a common firing line, in part because it was not holding up people going downrange. My local club shoots in bays so it’s a choice between holding up the reset for a brief period versus having a posse member work the ULT. That said if the Rules Committee considers the practice as a “departure” from the rules I will rethink it.

A question about a dropped 1911 was asked in a Facebook group spawned a couple of discussions. First the rules: A dropped unloaded gun on the firing line (defined as the LT to the ULT) is a SDQ. Sweeping anyone with an unloaded firearm (without the qualification of on the firing line) is a SDQ. It is not unusual at WBAS matches locally to announce that long guns will be cleared on the line at the conclusion of the stage. I don't see that as altering a safety convention. The 1911 is, of course, cleared on the line by the TO. OK, so the first question is an easy one: If no ULT is in use, what is the end point of the firing line? In my view, the places in the stage where the long guns were discarded are the ULT and the firing line ends when the last gun has been cleared on the line. What if the pistol is the last gun cleared-is the firing line still in effect until the pistol is holstered? Second question is a softball, too. In the original FB post, the TO cleared the 1911, the shooter tabled the pistol and the TO them cleared the long guns on the line. As the shooter retrieved the pistol he dropped it, resulting in the TO being swept and the 170 was broken. My view, after checking the SHB, was that the shooter failed to follow the mandatory commands for clearing the 1911, the last step of which is to holster the pistol. That is a SDQ, probably at the point when the shooter took his hand off of the cleared, tabled pistol. Any disagreement so far? The final questions are not specific to WBAS but involves a dropped unloaded pistol off of the firing line. I always understood that to be a no call. But if it sweeps someone or breaks the 170 is that different? A friend of mine who is a very experienced TO maintains that only a gun in hand or otherwise under the shooter's control is capable of sweeping. I think that's a logical interpretation. Thoughts?

Thanks, GJ. I like an occasional “shotgun heavy” stage. In general I prefer stage instructions to be concise and not cover issues already addressed in the conventions but I see your point about putting a six round limit on the “preload”.

At our recent match the last stage featured eight shotgun targets. The rule says that the shooter may load the magazine “with the number of rounds required for the initial target sequence”. I think an unmodified ‘97 will hold five and a Model 12 will hold six “standard” 2.75” shells. We were speculating whether a shooter might be able to use Aguila “minishells”, or a handloaded equivalent, to increase magazine capacity and gain an advantage on stages that have an “initial target sequence” greater than six. I’ve heard different opinions whether a shorter shell would feed properly but let’s assume it could be done without an illegal modification to the shotgun. The rules prevent making a shotshell a smaller diameter but length is not addressed. Certainly the stage instructions could specify that no more than six shells may be loaded but I’m just trying to confirm whether the short shells would be legal. I’m going to add a “thank you” to Happy Jack, Boggus Deal and the WB Rules Committee for the time and effort spent in reviewing and revising the rules. The changes have been well received here.

And it appears that we can load up to eight rounds in the 1911 magazines now? Do you think pistol sequences will continue to be multiples of seven?

A holster for a single action revolver will serve as a Wild Bunch holster. We never reholster the 1911 on the clock so you don’t need an elaborate holster. You will need magazine pouches.

Thanks, Jack.

Looks like a CAS rule change is coming to eliminate the automatic SDQ for leaving the LT with the rifle hammer cocked or halfcocked. We all know that a rifle hammer at halfcock is a no-call in Wild Bunch. Should WBAS follow suit? Some differences in the rules between the two sports is necessary but since the rifle is used the same way that there may be some advantage to “conforming” the rules.

We are pretty hard pressed to have any WBAS matches in my area (people are working on it), much less a BAMM side match but I would love to try it. At a recent gun show I ran across an FN 1924 manufactured for the Mexican government in 7mm Mauser. I thought, what could be better? I let that one go. I happened to stop by my local Cabelas today to pick up some ammo boxes and what did they have in the "Library" but a 1903A3 and a K31. Just right for BAMM, right?

Thanks, Travis.

Any hints of what might be changing?

Lots of suitable powders; many have been mentioned. If you like the faster burning powders you might like Clean Shot from Shooters World. It is a very fine grained powder. If you prefer a midrange powder such as Unique, consider Universal or IMR's Unequal which is its "answer" to Unique.

I've not had the pleasure of meeting Frank or Boggus but their contributions to the community through this forum is always positive.

I started cowboy action seven years ago. Atbthat time it seemed that most stage instructions were specific as to shooting positions, target designations and even target order. Over time, though, I noticed some changes: sweeps could begin on either side of a target array. The shooter begins at Position A but can move to either Position B or Position C. I have seen this general trend in Wild Bunch. My local club lost its Wild Bunch match day to Three Gun. There was a growing demand among club members and numbers matter. I tried it a couple of times. One of the features that I found interesting was how shooters were sometimes given the option of which firearms to use when engaging targets. For example, on a particular stage the shooter could engage KDs with pistol or shotgun. Very interesting. I shot a Wild Bunch match yesterday. On one stage there was a line of poppers. Stage instructions said to engage three KDs with the rifle, then shoot the shotgun, and with the pistol alternate between a static target and KDs. From the written instructions it appeared that the rifle targets were the ones on the right end of the array but in the walkthrough the MD said that the shooter could engage any three KDs with the rifle. Because the static target was above the right side of the target array, I decided to engage the poppers on the left side of the array, so that less movement was needed to alternate pistol shots between the static target and the remaining KDs. I thought the flexibility in that stage was interesting. It made me think. Has anyone seen this in Wild Bunch matches? Think it's a good idea?

More good pointers. Two local clubs used activators that had to be shot. Those were cowboy matches but the stage instructions covered what to do if the shooter missed the activator. These matches were after the WBAS match that prompted this topic so I was very interested in knowing how to shoot it or call it. We've been shooting clay-launching poppers with shotguns for years in cowboy matches but we never faced the one shot/two misses problem because of the Comstock Rule.

I agree but in this instance the stage instructions are silent and there is no alternative target so I am trying to figure out how this would play out under the Stage Conventions.

Thanks, GJ. I ran a search before posting but did not see the prior discussion. I omitted discussion of the options that would result in a Procedural but those are certainly possible outcomes.