Jump to content
The SASS Wild Bunch Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted

At any of the recent "bigger shoots," especially Land Run or End of Trail, were ammo samples tested for Power Factor?  

Just curious.

Posted
22 hours ago, Flying W Ramrod said:

It's in the WBAS SHB, pg 31


I guess I never really considered that to be an actual chronograph procedure because 1) it is not required at any level of match and 2) it doesn't really include any safeguards to ensure the equipment is reliable or even the testing is reliable.  Which is probably why I have never seen a chrono at any SASS competition.  An effective test procedure requires that scales and chronos be calibrated and usually multiple units are used to ensure accuracy.  Nobody wants to ruin a major match for someone based on faulty information.

I did pucker a little bit when my ammo only went 127 at my most recent match though.  Chronoed 134 at home, and 133 out of another 9mm on Friday, only to barely make it on Saturday.  I bet I won't do that again.  That was with calibrated scales, two radar based chronographs, and a longer barrel!

Posted
30 minutes ago, El Chapo said:


I guess I never really considered that to be an actual chronograph procedure because 1) it is not required at any level of match and 2) it doesn't really include any safeguards to ensure the equipment is reliable or even the testing is reliable.  Which is probably why I have never seen a chrono at any SASS competition.  An effective test procedure requires that scales and chronos be calibrated and usually multiple units are used to ensure accuracy.  Nobody wants to ruin a major match for someone based on faulty information.

I did pucker a little bit when my ammo only went 127 at my most recent match though.  Chronoed 134 at home, and 133 out of another 9mm on Friday, only to barely make it on Saturday.  I bet I won't do that again.  That was with calibrated scales, two radar based chronographs, and a longer barrel!

It's used when there is an appearance of PF failure.

At the old WR, it was used every day, every year. 

Random shooter, one or two per posse, had to submit ammo in ziplocks to be tested.

Happened the same way at the older 4 Corners Regionals.

Happened, for cause, at a 4 corners regional as well. Shooter had to change ammo. PF was so low it wasn't cycling his 1911.

  • Like 3
Posted

Every EOT WB held at Founders Ranch had random rifle and pistol ammo from "random" shooters pulled and tested for meeting the +150 PF level.  I know from personal experience as I attended all of those matches.  And usually there were weight checks and functioning safeties tested.  Some of those I conducted or supervised.  Even if no thumb safety application is practiced at any WB match I've been in.   good luck, GJ

  • Like 1
Posted

I have seen safety checks and ammo pulled and some tested. I don't have a problem with that being done...and it probably should be done...along with weighing pistols. 

I think that really at checkin...pistols should be weighed and the grip safety checked. During the match...random samples of ammo pulled and at least some of it checked.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 3/24/2026 at 8:42 PM, Flying W Ramrod said:

It's used when there is an appearance of PF failure.

At the old WR, it was used every day, every year. 

Random shooter, one or two per posse, had to submit ammo in ziplocks to be tested.

Happened the same way at the older 4 Corners Regionals.

Happened, for cause, at a 4 corners regional as well. Shooter had to change ammo. PF was so low it wasn't cycling his 1911.

Doing it like that seems tremendously unfair and to send the wrong message.


If it can't be done with calibrated equipment and for everyone, it shouldn't be done at all.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, El Chapo said:

Doing it like that seems tremendously unfair and to send the wrong message.


If it can't be done with calibrated equipment and for everyone, it shouldn't be done at all.

There was a bay where the equipment was set up for anyone to test their loads. That was the day before WB started.

Some folks took advantage of the opportunity, some didn't.

It's impractical to check 150+ shooters ammo, at five rounds each, and still complete the match.

There is no more MDQ for scoring purposes so, once challenged and found lacking, it's a SDQ for any stage, after that, the ammo is used, and a MDQ for the second stage used. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Flying W Ramrod said:

There was a bay where the equipment was set up for anyone to test their loads. That was the day before WB started.

Some folks took advantage of the opportunity, some didn't.

It's impractical to check 150+ shooters ammo, at five rounds each, and still complete the match.

There is no more MDQ for scoring purposes so, once challenged and found lacking, it's a SDQ for any stage, after that, the ammo is used, and a MDQ for the second stage used. 

 

No, it’s not impractical. Other shooting sports tests everyone’s ammo. Not hard to do at all.

Posted
1 hour ago, Boggus Deal said:

One bay. 2 volunteers. In between 2 stages somewhere in the match.

How many competitors and, knowing how WB at WR/EOT/Landrun is held, any way to do that at these matches?

And, I guess you'd have to hope the ammo brought for testing is the same used during the match. Remember there's a reason for the smoke factor.

I'd like to see PF testing and, at the same time and bay, weight and safety checks. Especially the safety checks. Match Directors are setting themselves up for liability by not ensuring the safeties are functioning properly. i.e. Your Honor, why did they assume the safeties were functional.

Posted

All USPSA matches are tested and there are several hundred shooters. For example, testing is on stage 4. As shooters finish stage 3, they go test. It’s recorded. They go to stage 5. Match officials check PF for major and minor levels and if a shooter doesn’t meet, they face consequences. 
Shooter gets to the test area, official asks for a magazine off the body and tests. May be first mag maybe third mag. 
I prefer knockdowns that require a certain level of PF. Yes, it’s hard to keep them calibrated. Yes, it’s a lot of work for a match staff. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Boggus Deal said:

All USPSA matches are tested and there are several hundred shooters. For example, testing is on stage 4. As shooters finish stage 3, they go test. It’s recorded. They go to stage 5. Match officials check PF for major and minor levels and if a shooter doesn’t meet, they face consequences. 
Shooter gets to the test area, official asks for a magazine off the body and tests. May be first mag maybe third mag. 
I prefer knockdowns that require a certain level of PF. Yes, it’s hard to keep them calibrated. Yes, it’s a lot of work for a match staff. 

Great idea. Get a bay, that's not being used, turn it into check bay. Shooters come off the previous bay, check in at test bay, weigh, check safeties, do PF test, move on.

I like it.

Now, to get the Powers That Be, involved.

Thanks for the ideas.

 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...