Jorge Posted Monday at 10:14 PM Posted Monday at 10:14 PM At any of the recent "bigger shoots," especially Land Run or End of Trail, were ammo samples tested for Power Factor? Just curious. Quote
Flying W Ramrod Posted yesterday at 02:21 AM Posted yesterday at 02:21 AM Not at EOT for rifle (classic) or pistol Quote
Garrison Joe Posted yesterday at 02:43 AM Posted yesterday at 02:43 AM Murphy says, "when you think they won't test PF, they will" good luck, GJ Quote
El Chapo Posted yesterday at 02:52 AM Posted yesterday at 02:52 AM I sure wish we had a procedure in the rules. Quote
Flying W Ramrod Posted yesterday at 03:45 AM Posted yesterday at 03:45 AM (edited) It's in the WBAS SHB, pg 31 53 minutes ago, El Chapo said: I sure wish we had a procedure in the rules. Edited yesterday at 03:46 AM by Flying W Ramrod Quote
Ranger Dan Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago SE Regional at Memphis Gunslingers had it set up on side match day. Not mandatory, but I had mine done to be sure. Quote
El Chapo Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 22 hours ago, Flying W Ramrod said: It's in the WBAS SHB, pg 31 I guess I never really considered that to be an actual chronograph procedure because 1) it is not required at any level of match and 2) it doesn't really include any safeguards to ensure the equipment is reliable or even the testing is reliable. Which is probably why I have never seen a chrono at any SASS competition. An effective test procedure requires that scales and chronos be calibrated and usually multiple units are used to ensure accuracy. Nobody wants to ruin a major match for someone based on faulty information. I did pucker a little bit when my ammo only went 127 at my most recent match though. Chronoed 134 at home, and 133 out of another 9mm on Friday, only to barely make it on Saturday. I bet I won't do that again. That was with calibrated scales, two radar based chronographs, and a longer barrel! Quote
Flying W Ramrod Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 30 minutes ago, El Chapo said: I guess I never really considered that to be an actual chronograph procedure because 1) it is not required at any level of match and 2) it doesn't really include any safeguards to ensure the equipment is reliable or even the testing is reliable. Which is probably why I have never seen a chrono at any SASS competition. An effective test procedure requires that scales and chronos be calibrated and usually multiple units are used to ensure accuracy. Nobody wants to ruin a major match for someone based on faulty information. I did pucker a little bit when my ammo only went 127 at my most recent match though. Chronoed 134 at home, and 133 out of another 9mm on Friday, only to barely make it on Saturday. I bet I won't do that again. That was with calibrated scales, two radar based chronographs, and a longer barrel! It's used when there is an appearance of PF failure. At the old WR, it was used every day, every year. Random shooter, one or two per posse, had to submit ammo in ziplocks to be tested. Happened the same way at the older 4 Corners Regionals. Happened, for cause, at a 4 corners regional as well. Shooter had to change ammo. PF was so low it wasn't cycling his 1911. Quote
Boggus Deal Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago What was really bad was when SASS sold ammo that didn’t meet power factor when it was tested.. 1 Quote
Garrison Joe Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Every EOT WB held at Founders Ranch had random rifle and pistol ammo from "random" shooters pulled and tested for meeting the +150 PF level. I know from personal experience as I attended all of those matches. And usually there were weight checks and functioning safeties tested. Some of those I conducted or supervised. Even if no thumb safety application is practiced at any WB match I've been in. good luck, GJ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.