If the rules are in the TG's hands and every WB TG meeting that has occurred had overwhelming support of a 150PF, why don't we put it to a vote and put it to bed.
Starting in 2019, we had three years of double digit growth at our State WB matches, then all the rule change rumblings started and we've been down shooters ever since. I know this is localized data, but it is consistent in the adjacent state matches I've shot.
I'm from the "Show-Me" state and I really need someone to show me the data to back up this membership change. The size of matches, both CB and WB do not reflect this change.
As discussed in the EoT TG meeting if the low PF was a non-isssue then EoT should have felt comfortable running rifle last. Their rifle speed matches and other testing have not provided that comfort. CC I know your range is a lot like ours with most of the stages being covered/enclosed and maybe that's the difference vs the wide open at Ben Avery. If they aren't comfortable running rifle last at the World Championship, I don't feel like it's put to bed.
We don't need a category just for those that make PF. Even with this, it would not fix the rifle not last issue unless you have category specific stage instructions.
Our club has had zero participation with 38 rifles. I know this has had a few additional shooters at larger matches. However for the most part I have seen about half or more of the 38 shooters come from the existing WB shooter pool.